Start 14-Day Trial Subscription
*No credit card required
Judging Process
Our reviews are conducted in a single-blind tasting format. This method provides the best opportunity to rely on facts and to avoid favoritism, ensuring a level playing field for all brewers. It serves both the industry and the consumer to have unbiased and objective scores from qualified experts. To best implement this approach, the Judges Review is open to those with established experience as a Master Cicerone® from the Cicerone® Certification Program or as a judge that has accomplished the rank of National or higher from the Beer Judge Certification Program. In the single-blind tasting format, judges are presented with a chilled, properly poured beer and given its style category. Scoring is then done on the following basis using a 100-point scale:
Score Breakdown:
100 to 96: World Class – You need this beer in your life.
95 to 91: Exceptional – Don’t hesitate.
90 to 86: Very Good – A brew to savor.
85 to 75: Average – Somewhat unimpressive.
74 and below: Not Recommended – Just walk away.
Exceptional (95 to 91)
91
by Randy Scorby
AleSmith Double IPA
AleSmith Brewing Co.
View Beer
Read Review
Brewer Q & A
91
by Randy Scorby
Uror
FATE Brewing Co.
View Beer
Read Review
Brewer Q & A
91
by Jason Johnson
Kriek des Jacobins
Brouwerij Omer VanderGhinste
91
by Susan Ruud
Wayfarer
Green Man Brewery
View Beer
Read Review
Brewer Q & A
91
by John C. Tull
SteamPunk
Noble Rey Brewing Co.
91
by Michael Heniff
Brutal IPA
Rogue Ales & Spirits
View Beer
Read Review
Brewer Q & A
91
by Josh Weikert
Whitewater
Great Divide Brewing Co.
View Beer
Read Review
Brewer Q & A
91
by Joseph Formanek
Transilience
Southbound Brewing Co.
View Beer
Read Review
Brewer Q & A
91
by Sean Coughlin
Nimble Giant
Troegs Brewing Co.