Start 14-Day Trial Subscription
*No credit card required
Judging Process
Our reviews are conducted in a single-blind tasting format. This method provides the best opportunity to rely on facts and to avoid favoritism, ensuring a level playing field for all brewers. It serves both the industry and the consumer to have unbiased and objective scores from qualified experts. To best implement this approach, the Judges Review is open to those with established experience as a Master Cicerone® from the Cicerone® Certification Program or as a judge that has accomplished the rank of National or higher from the Beer Judge Certification Program. In the single-blind tasting format, judges are presented with a chilled, properly poured beer and given its style category. Scoring is then done on the following basis using a 100-point scale:
Score Breakdown:
100 to 96: World Class – You need this beer in your life.
95 to 91: Exceptional – Don’t hesitate.
90 to 86: Very Good – A brew to savor.
85 to 75: Average – Somewhat unimpressive.
74 and below: Not Recommended – Just walk away.
Exceptional (95 to 91)
94
by Richard Wong
Ol' Dirty Barrel
Belching Beaver Brewing Co.
View Beer
Read Review
Brewer Q & A
94
by Nelson Crowle
Watermelon Dorado
Ballast Point Brewing & Spirits
View Beer
Read Review
Brewer Q & A
94
by Michael Heniff
Colonel Kernel
The Bruery / Bruery Terreux
94
by Mike Castagno
Wide Awake It's Morning
Funky Buddha Brewing Co.
View Beer
Read Review
Brewer Q & A
94
by Jason Johnson
VanderGhinste Oud Bruin
Brouwerij Omer VanderGhinste
94
by Richard Wong
8 Hop IPA
Rogue Ales & Spirits
View Beer
Read Review
Brewer Q & A
94
by Michael Heniff
Rogue American Amber Ale
Rogue Ales & Spirits
View Beer
Read Review
Brewer Q & A
94
by Jason Johnson
Snozzberry
Green Man Brewery
94
by Graham L. Barron
Summer Saison
Blackberry Farm Brewery
View Beer
Read Review
Brewer Q & A
94
by Michael Heniff
True Blonde
Ska Brewing Co.
View Beer
Read Review
Brewer Q & A
94
by Tracy Hensley
The Optimist
Fort George Brewery