Start 14-Day Trial Subscription
*No credit card required
Judging Process
Our reviews are conducted in a single-blind tasting format. This method provides the best opportunity to rely on facts and to avoid favoritism, ensuring a level playing field for all brewers. It serves both the industry and the consumer to have unbiased and objective scores from qualified experts. To best implement this approach, the Judges Review is open to those with established experience as a Master Cicerone® from the Cicerone® Certification Program or as a judge that has accomplished the rank of National or higher from the Beer Judge Certification Program. In the single-blind tasting format, judges are presented with a chilled, properly poured beer and given its style category. Scoring is then done on the following basis using a 100-point scale:
Score Breakdown:
100 to 96: World Class – You need this beer in your life.
95 to 91: Exceptional – Don’t hesitate.
90 to 86: Very Good – A brew to savor.
85 to 75: Average – Somewhat unimpressive.
74 and below: Not Recommended – Just walk away.
Exceptional (95 to 91)
95
by Richard Wong
Beatitude Mango
Council Brewing Co.
95
by Jason Johnson
St. Lupulin
Odell Brewing Co.
95
by Michael Heniff
Humulus Terreux
The Bruery / Bruery Terreux
95
by Nelson Crowle
Pace Car Racer
Bear Republic Brewing Co.
95
by Tracy Hensley
Suicide Squeeze IPA
Fort George Brewery
95
by Joseph Formanek
Funky Gold Simcoe
Prairie Artisan Ales
95
by Joseph Formanek
Coffee Okie
Prairie Artisan Ales
95
by Nelson Crowle
Saison Imperiale
De Proef Brouwerij
95
by Michael Heniff
Decadent Imperial IPA
Ska Brewing Co.